Conversation
Contributor
|
Just for information you can make request to "SYNO.Entry.Request" API using "batch_request" function from base_api :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP: LDAP Server API
This PR introduces initial support for the Synology LDAP Server API.
Context
The naming for the Directory / LDAP Server APIs is very confusing:
SYNO.DirectoryServerAPI.SYNO.ActiveDirectoryAPI.What’s Included
list_userscreate_new_userMissing
Of course, there are other endpoints to be implemented.
Also, proper error handling needs to be added. I wasn't sure how to correctly match
SYNO.Entry.Request, because besidesSyno.ActiveDirectory(the Directory Server API),Syno.DirectoryServer(the LDAP Server API) seems to use it too. So I left that for later.Extended parameter validation should also be added as the LDAP API seems to sometimes add invalid/incomplete entries instead of rejecting them (moving the example _assert_expireddate_validity() function to another place in the codebase along with other functions)
I hope to be able add more myself in the near future but as my time is very limited right now, I wanted to publish this draft first.
This is NOT really tested yet. Will do that in the next days.